Incredible! Disorder in the modern Democratic Party goes back to a guy named Schachtman who moves to Long Island and opens a mail-order business, growing orchids -- yet! -- on the side. History is merciless and hilarious, too. Thanks, Rich.
Another outstanding column, Rich. I’m glad you mentioned Michael Harrington. I know someone who went to school with him, and we were discussing him yesterday.
The controversy still swirling around Walter Duranty comes to mind. He won a Pulitzer in 1932. Duranty’s reporting was called into question by Gareth Jones, an Associated Press reporter who covered Soviet polices. In a 1933 article, Jones attacked Duranty for denying the existence of the Ukrainian famine that killed millions and accused him of misleading the public. (Asst by AI)
Fascinating piece on a tortured history. Exceptionally relevant for today's activists and political thinkers. Of the many insights in the piece, this one stands out to me, given how easy it is to romanticize revolutionary leaders: "This was a poisonous fight for power, not a principled struggle between moderation and extremism. Both men [Trotsky and Stalin] were comfortable using violence to achieve their ends."
Incredible! Disorder in the modern Democratic Party goes back to a guy named Schachtman who moves to Long Island and opens a mail-order business, growing orchids -- yet! -- on the side. History is merciless and hilarious, too. Thanks, Rich.
Another outstanding column, Rich. I’m glad you mentioned Michael Harrington. I know someone who went to school with him, and we were discussing him yesterday.
Thanks Bob.
The controversy still swirling around Walter Duranty comes to mind. He won a Pulitzer in 1932. Duranty’s reporting was called into question by Gareth Jones, an Associated Press reporter who covered Soviet polices. In a 1933 article, Jones attacked Duranty for denying the existence of the Ukrainian famine that killed millions and accused him of misleading the public. (Asst by AI)
Fascinating piece on a tortured history. Exceptionally relevant for today's activists and political thinkers. Of the many insights in the piece, this one stands out to me, given how easy it is to romanticize revolutionary leaders: "This was a poisonous fight for power, not a principled struggle between moderation and extremism. Both men [Trotsky and Stalin] were comfortable using violence to achieve their ends."
SUCH a marvelous treatment of Trotsky, his times & yes his relevance even today (DSA take note!!). Thank you, Richard !!!